RAFT Science Lab
Your Mission: Write a persuasive essay that convinces NASA to purchase your prototype rocket.
R – Scientist developing a new rocket prototype
A – NASA Jet Propulsion Lab Scientists
F – Official Report/Proposal – formal language
T – Purchase of Rocket Design by NASA
|
Trait |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Basic |
Minimal
|
|
Ideas
Clear, well-developed, focused writing |
Clear, well-selected details support the main idea
A strong main idea
10 9.5 9.0 |
Thesis is recognizable
Details help expand the main idea. The reader may have some questions 8.5 8.0 |
Unclear thesis
Skimpy support or description
7.5 7.0 |
No thesis
Specifics are missing.
6.5 6.0 |
|
Organization
Logical order
|
Inviting intro & satisfying conclusion
All elements seem to fit where they are placed; nothing feels out of order
Smooth transitions
10 9.5 9.0 |
Intro & conclusion present
Most elements fit where they are placed
Transitions present
8.5 8.0 |
Intro or conclusion is ineffective to guide the readers
Some elements do NOT fit where they are placed
Unclear transitions
7.5 7.0 |
No lead or conclusion
No transitions
6.5 6.0 |
|
Voice
Unique perspective of a scientific writer
|
The voice is totally appropriate for the purpose, topic, and audience
Formal third person perspective (no you, I, we, etc…) 5.0 4.5 |
Voice is reasonably appropriate for the purpose, topic, and audience
Some second or first person used
4.0 |
Voice may be missing or inappropriate for audience and purpose
Disproportionate use of second or first person
3.5 |
Not written in third person formal voice
Sounds informal
Inappropriate slang used
3.0 |
|
Word Choice
Precise, descriptive language |
Each word is clear and defined, directly or in context.
The writer writes to clarify.
5.0 4.5 |
Distinctive phrasing is evident, though the piece may include some clichés, wordiness, jargon, or redundancy.
4.0 |
Clichés, vague phrases, wordiness, and jargon or redundancy are likely to be problems.
3.5 |
Clichés, vague phrasing, wordiness, jargon, or redundancy are common problems and block meaning.
3.0 |
|
Sentence Fluency
Rhythm & flow of language
|
Almost every sentence begins differently
Sentences vary in structure and length.
5.0 4.5 |
Many sentences begin differently
Some variation in sentence length and style is also evident. 4.0 |
Some sentences begin differently.
Sentences tend to be similar in length; variety is rare.
3.5 |
Sentences tend to begin the same way, with little or no variety.
Sentences are similar in length.
3.0 |
|
Conventions
Grammar, punctuation, & spelling
|
Grammar and usage correct and contribute to clarity, style.
The piece is very close to being ready to publish.
5.0 4.5 |
Problems with grammar doesn’t distort meaning, but not always correct
Moderate editing required to publish. 4.0 |
Errors in grammar occasionally disrupt meaning.
Much editing required to publish.
3.5 |
Errors in usage are very noticeable, frequent & affect meaning
Extensive editing required for clarification and for publication.
3.0 |