RAFT Science Lab

Your Mission: Write a persuasive essay that convinces NASA to purchase your prototype rocket.

 

R – Scientist developing a new rocket prototype

A – NASA Jet Propulsion Lab Scientists

F – Official Report/Proposal – formal language

T – Purchase of Rocket Design by NASA

 

Trait

Advanced

Proficient

Basic

Minimal

 

Ideas

 

Clear, well-developed, focused writing

Clear, well-selected details support the main idea

 

A strong main idea

 

  10     9.5      9.0

Thesis is recognizable

 

Details help expand the main idea.  The reader may have some questions

    8.5         8.0     

Unclear thesis

 

Skimpy support or description

 

 

   7.5        7.0

No thesis

 

Specifics are missing.

 

     6.5       6.0

Organization

 

Logical order

 

Inviting intro & satisfying conclusion

 

All elements seem to fit where they are placed; nothing feels out of order

 

Smooth transitions

 

  10     9.5      9.0

Intro & conclusion present

 

Most elements fit where they are placed

 

Transitions present

 

 

 

       8.5         8.0

Intro or conclusion is ineffective to guide the readers

 

Some elements do NOT fit where they are placed

 

Unclear transitions

 

    7.5        7.0

No lead or conclusion

 

No transitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

     6.5        6.0

Voice

 

Unique perspective of a scientific writer

 

The voice is totally appropriate for the purpose, topic, and audience

 

Formal third person perspective (no you, I, we, etc…)

     5.0     4.5

Voice is reasonably appropriate for the purpose, topic, and audience

 

Some second or first person used

 

           4.0

Voice may be missing or inappropriate for audience and purpose

 

Disproportionate use of second or first person

 

           3.5

Not written in third person formal voice

 

Sounds informal

 

Inappropriate slang used

 

          3.0

Word Choice

 

Precise, descriptive language

Each word is clear and defined, directly or in context.

 

The writer writes to clarify.

 

     5.0     4.5

Distinctive phrasing is evident, though the piece may include some clichés, wordiness, jargon, or redundancy.

 

           4.0

Clichés, vague phrases, wordiness, and jargon or redundancy are likely to be problems.

 

 

           3.5

Clichés, vague phrasing, wordiness, jargon, or redundancy are common problems and block meaning.

 

 

           3.0

Sentence Fluency

 

Rhythm & flow of language

 

Almost every sentence begins differently

 

Sentences vary in structure and length.

 

     5.0     4.5

Many sentences begin differently

 

Some variation in sentence length and style is also evident.

           4.0

Some sentences begin differently. 

 

Sentences tend to be similar in length; variety is rare.

 

           3.5

Sentences tend to begin the same way, with little or no variety.

 

Sentences are similar in length.

 

            3.0

Conventions

 

Grammar, punctuation, & spelling

 

Grammar and usage correct and contribute to clarity, style.

 

The piece is very close to being ready to publish.

 

     5.0     4.5

Problems with grammar doesn’t distort meaning,  but not always correct

 

Moderate editing required to publish.

            4.0

Errors in grammar occasionally disrupt meaning.

 

Much editing required to publish.

 

 

                 3.5

Errors in usage are very noticeable, frequent & affect meaning

 

Extensive editing required for clarification and for publication.

 

             3.0